NOCHES DE ENCANTO (BURLESQUE)

TELENOVELA = OPERACIÓN PSICOLÓGICA

SOAP OPERA = PSYOPS

Esta película es maravillosa porque:
This movie es wonderful because:

1) Es otra triste película estadounidense que muestra la estrategia capitalista de "pan y circo".

Si hubiese sido hecha con el estilo del "realismo socialista" en mente, podría haber quedado menos triste y decadente al exponer las contradicciones sociales de la sociedad burguesa.

La versión contemporánea de "pan y circo" es "licor y circo".

2) Evidencia la debacle social estadounidense.

Esta película incluye a un personaje homosexual, al parecer para cumplir con la agenda de promoción del homosexualismo. Nos abstenemos de comentar las escenas relativas a tal personaje.

3) Expone la crisis económica estadounidense y del capitalismo en general.

La dueña de un local en el que se muestra un espectáculo de bailarinas quiere mantener su negocio pese a las deudas. En el último minuto logra salvar su negocio y lo atribuye a "colocar su deseo en el universo", es decir, justifica la linda historia del filme mediante el discurso del pensamiento positivo y la "ley de atracción mental". :-)

Naturalmente, en la vida real existen porcentajes de negocios que quiebran y porcentajes de negocios que se mantienen en funcionamiento. Al parecer, este filme es para el público del sector de negocios que logran sobrevivir en el mercado y para los inversores.

4) Refleja la deshumanización de las relaciones sociales capitalistas.

Ali (Cristina Aguilera) trabaja en un local pequeño en un pueblo alejado de la metrópoli. Canta porque le gusta. Viaja a la metrópoli y luego de buscar bastante consigue un empleo (aunque se lo niegan inicialmente) en un local de espectáculos. Ante su insistencia en participar del grupo de baile, su jefa le indica que solamente podrá subir al estrado si le demuestra que el escenario "le pertenece". Esta voluntad de ser STALIN en la mejor época del culto a la personalidad demuestra el continuo proceso de deshumanización dentro de una sociedad con relaciones de dominación y subordinación. Existe un porcentaje de gente que logra volverse STALIN y porcentaje de gente que jamás se vuelve STALIN. "NOCHES DE ENCANTO" (BURLESQUE) es para ese gran grupo que sueña con el culto a la personalidad, para ese inmenso porcentaje que constituye la base política que mantiene a STALIN en su posición.

5) Es un distractor poderoso.

Mientras la industria de la distracción aleja a los ciudadanos de sus intereses políticos, la industria estadounidense de la guerra y de la "seguridad nacional" sigue introduciendo sus manitos (gigantes) en los bolsillos (pequeñitos) de los pobrecitos estadounidenses para financiar con los impuestos la construcción de templos a la muerte. Y estos templos son tan exclusivos que los contribuyentes ni siquiera los pueden conocer porque son "secretos" (¡ji-ji-ji!):

(La información completa en:

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/top-secret-america/functions/facilities/)

"Facilities and Infrastructure

Leasing and realty; design, construction, and renovation; management and maintenance of government-occupied facilities and military bases; and specialty construction associated with securing top-secret facilities, both internally and externally, including everything from fencing and barriers to sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIFs).

156 results for Facilities and Infrastructure

46 government organizations | 110 companies

Showing page of 0 page

Government Organization	HQ Location	Number of Locations	Number of Contracting Companies
Africa Command	Stuttgart-Moehringen, AE	2	19
Air Force	Arlington, VA	99	392
Air Force Intelligence	Arlington, VA	113	153
Army	Arlington, VA	106	353
Army Intelligence	Fort Belvoir, VA	93	120
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives	Washington, DC	182	28
Central Command	Tampa, FL	6	64
Central Intelligence Agency	McLean, VA	36	114
Coast Guard	Washington, DC	15	44
Congress	Washington, DC	1	0
Customs and Border Protection	Washington, DC	56	56
Defense agencies	Arlington, VA	78	332
Defense Intelligence Agency	Arlington, VA	22	317
Department of Defense HQ	Arlington, VA	80	291
Department of Energy	Washington, DC	18	87
Department of Homeland Security HQ	Washington, DC	270	318
Department of Justice	Washington, DC	52	89
Director of National Intelligence	McLean, VA	11	140
Drug Enforcement Administration	Arlington, VA	92	36
European Command	Stuttgart-Vaihingen, AE	2	11
Federal Bureau of Investigation	Washington, DC	448	173
Federal Emergency Management Agency	Washington, DC	21	40
Immigration and Customs Enforcement	Washington, DC	45	12
Joint Chiefs of Staff	Arlington, VA	6	45
Joint Forces Command	Norfolk, VA	8	45
Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Org.	Arlington, VA	4	68
Marine Corps	Arlington, VA	24	82
National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency	Bethesda, MD	8	121
National Reconnaissance Office	Chantilly, VA	6	124
National Security Agency	Ft. Meade, MD	19	484
Navy	Arlington, VA	56	385
Navy Intelligence	Arlington, VA	31	104
Northern Command	Colorado Springs, CO	13	56
Other civil departments and agencies	Washington, DC	31	4
Pacific Command	Camp H.M. Smith, HI	6	27
Secret Service	Washington, DC	117	17
Southern Command	Miami, FL	9	29
Special Operations Command	Tampa, FL	12	125
State Department	Washington, DC	9	146
States and National Guard	Washington, DC	3	3
Strategic Command	Omaha, NE	14	99
Transportation Command	Scott AFB, IL	1	11
Transportation Security Administration	Arlington, VA	11	49
Treasury Department	Washington, DC	6	90
Unknown		0	455
White House	Washington, DC	2	26

Company Name	HQ Location	Year Est.	Employees	Revenue	Locations	Govt. Clients
ABS Consulting	Houston, Texas	1971	501-2,000	Under $100 million	2	4
Adamo Construction	Lakeside, California	1997	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	3
ADT Security Services, Inc.	Boca Raton, Florida	1874	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	2	1
Advanced Concepts Enterprises, Inc.	Shalimar, Florida	2002	101-500	Under $100 million	1	2
Aecom	Los Angeles, California	1970	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	7	3
AEEC, LLC. dba American Consultants	Reston, Virginia	1995	26-100	Under $100 million	1	5
Alamo City Engineering Services Inc.	San Antonio, Texas	2002	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	5
Aleut Management Services, a Nana Company	Colorado Springs, Colorado	2004	101-500	Unknown	3	6
Artec Group, The	Tampa, Florida	1991	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	7
Black and Veatch	Overland Park, Kansas	1916	Unknown	Unknown	2	2
C4 Planning Solutions	Blythe, Georgia	2000	26-100	Unknown	4	1
Carpathia Hosting, Inc.	Ashburn, Virginia	2003	26-100	Unknown	1	1
CH2M HILL	Englewood, Colorado	1998	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	1	1
Chamberlain Group	Lynchburg, Virginia	1997	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	2
Chugach Alaska Corporation	Anchorage, Alaska	1972	5,000-10,000	$750 million to $1 billion	8	2
Comark Building Systems	Desoto, Texas	1989	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	1	1
COPT	Columbia, Maryland	1988	101-500	$750 million to $1 billion	1	1
CSI Engineering PC	Beltsville, Maryland	1991	26-100	Unknown	1	4
Davis Construction	Rockville, Maryland	1966	101-500	$750 million to $1 billion	1	1
dck Worldwide	Clairton, Pennsylvania	2007	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	1	1
Deco, Inc.	Champlin, Minnesota	1986	501-2,000	Under $100 million	1	1
Defense Solutions LLC	Exton, Pennsylvania	2003	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	1
Digital Realty Trust	San Francisco, California	2004	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	1	1
Dimensions Contracting	San Antonio, Texas	2008	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	2
DPR Construction, Inc.	Falls Church, Virginia	1990	Unknown	Unknown	1	1
Dynamic Corporation	Hyattsville, Maryland	1989	101-500	Under $100 million	1	1
EM-SEC Technologies LLC	Hampton, Virginia	1998	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	2	1
EMCOR Group	Norwalk, Connecticut	1992	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	5	1
Energy Technologies, Inc.	Mansfield, Ohio	1991	26-100	Under $100 million	1	6
Facility Technology Services, Inc.	Sterling, Virginia	2002	26-100	Under $100 million	2	1
FlowSense LLC	Maple Grove, Minnesota	2001	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	4
Frank O'Connor, Inc.	Clifton, Virginia	1989	26-100	Under $100 million	1	1
Frankie Friend and Associates	Englewood, Colorado	1993	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	3
Frontier Systems Integrators, LLC	Fairfax, Virginia	2001	101-500	Under $100 million	3	5
Futron Incorporated	Lorton, Virginia	1994	26-100	Under $100 million	3	3
Gatekeeper, Inc.	Jackson, Mississippi	1999	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Green Way Enterprises, Inc.	Helena, Montana	1978	26-100	Under $100 million	1	2
Gutierrez-Palmenberg, Inc.	Phoenix, Arizona	1980	26-100	Under $100 million	2	2
HDR, Inc.	Omaha, Nebraska	1917	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	3	2
Henkels & McCoy, Inc.	Blue Bell, Pennsylvania	1923	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	2	1
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc.	Cape Canaveral, Florida	1974	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	3	8
Icon Construction	McKinney, Texas	1998	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	5
Industrial Security Consulting Services LLC	Helotes, Texas	2005	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Innovative Technologies Corp.	Dayton, Ohio	1987	26-100	Unknown	1	1
Jacobs Technology	Pasadena, California	1947	10,000+	$10 billion to $50 billion	21	5
JHM Research and Development, Inc.	Silver Spring, Maryland	1987	101-500	Unknown	1	7
JHT	Orlando, Florida	1990	101-500	Under $100 million	2	8
John C. Grimberg Co., Inc.	Rockville, Maryland	1951	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	2	3
JTSI, Inc.	Kailua, Hawaii	2002	26-100	Under $100 million	2	2
Kaseman LLC	Fairfax, Virginia	2000	101-500	Under $100 million	2	3
Kiewit Corporation	Omaha, Nebraska	1985	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	1	1
Kwajalein Range Services	Huntsville, Alabama	2002	2,001-5,000	Unknown	1	1
Logis-Tech	Manassas, Virginia	1987	101-500	Under $100 million	1	1
Logistics 2020, Inc.	Chesterfield, Virginia	2000	101-500	Under $100 million	2	4
Logistics Applications Inc.	Alexandria, Virginia	1986	101-500	Under $100 million	2	5
Los Alamos Technical Associates	Los Alamos, New Mexico	1976	Unknown	Unknown	1	4
MAR, Inc.	Rockville, Maryland	1971	101-500	Under $100 million	2	6
MARKON Inc.	Falls Church, Virginia	2007	26-100	Under $100 million	2	2
Martek Global Services	Bethesda, Maryland	1996	26-100	Under $100 million	1	7
MC Dean, Inc.	Sterling, Virginia	1949	501-2,000	Unknown	3	1
Mele Associates	Rockville, Maryland	1993	101-500	Unknown	1	8
Mercom Corporation	Pawleys Island, South Carolina	2000	26-100	Under $100 million	1	4
Mercury Data Systems	Greensboro, North Carolina	1994	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Merrick and Company	Aurora, Colorado	1955	101-500	Under $100 million	2	1
Merritt Construction	Baltimore, Maryland	1967	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	2	1
MNM Communications	Burtonsville, Maryland	1991	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	4
Modular Space Systems	Jacksonville, Florida	1995	Unknown	Unknown	1	3
NANA Regional Corporation	Anchorage, Alaska	1974	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	6	9
Olgoonik Global Security	Arlington, Virginia	2006	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	2
Omayacon, LLC	Anchorage, Alaska	2008	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	1
Omega Federation	Honolulu, Hawaii	2000	26-100	Under $100 million	1	4
P2MG	Houston, Texas	2003	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Page and Kraemer	Lafayette, Louisiana	1990	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Palmer's Contracting Group	Warrenton, Virginia	1994	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Parsons Brinckerhoff	N.Y., New York	1885	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	1	2
Parsons Corporation	PASADENA, California	1944	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	12	2
Phillips Defense Systems, inc.	Quantico, Virginia	1994	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	2
Piedmont Office Realty Trust	Johns Creek, Georgia	1997	101-500	$100 million to $750 million	1	1
Planate Management Group LLC	Alexandria, Virginia	2007	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Price Systems LLC	Mount Laurel, New Jersey	1998	26-100	Unknown	1	1
Pro2Serve	Oak Ridge, Tennessee	1996	101-500	Under $100 million	3	1
Project Developers, Inc.	Sterling, Virginia	1989	Unknown	Unknown	1	1
RAM, Inc.	El Paso, Texas	1982	501-2,000	Under $100 million	2	1
Ranger Group, The	McLean, Virginia	2006	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	2
Realty Diversified Services	Leesburg, Virginia	1975	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	1
Ryan Commercial	Towson, Maryland	1997	<25 td="">	Unknown	1	1
SCIF Constructors	Chantilly, Virginia	1986	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
SCIF Solutions Inc, USA	Orange Park, Florida	2004	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
ServerVault	Dulles, Virginia	2002	26-100	Unknown	1	1
Siemens	New York, New York	1999	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	3	2
St. John Properties	Baltimore, Maryland	1971	101-500	Unknown	1	1
Strategic Resources Inc.	McLean, Virginia	1988	101-500	Under $100 million	1	1
Sullivan International Group	San Diego, California	1998	101-500	Unknown	1	6
Sympora Construction	Oxon Hill, Maryland	2000	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Systematic Management Services, Inc.	Germantown, Maryland	1979	26-100	Unknown	2	1
Tapestry Solutions	San Diego, California	1993	101-500	Unknown	1	1
Tetra Tech	Pasadena, California	1966	5,000-10,000	$1 billion to $10 billion	2	3
Toeroek Associates, Inc.	Wheat Ridge, Colorado	1993	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	2	1
Transtecs Corporation	Wichita, Kansas	1988	101-500	Under $100 million	2	2
Turner Interiors	Arlington, Virginia	1902	Unknown	Unknown	3	1
URS Corporation	SAN FRANCISCO, California	1957	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	36	14
VSE Corporation	Alexandria, Virginia	1959	2,001-5,000	$750 million to $1 billion	1	5
VT Group	Virginia Beach, Virginia	2009	10,000+	$1 billion to $10 billion	3	8
VTS Enterprises LLC	Mentor, Ohio	2005	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Weston Solutions, Inc.	West Chester, Pennsylvania	1957	501-2,000	$100 million to $750 million	2	2
Williams Notaro and Associates	Fairfax, Virginia	1997	<25 td="">	Under $100 million	1	1
Wintara, Inc.	Oxon Hill, Maryland	2000	26-100	Under $100 million	1	1
Woolpert	Dayton, Ohio	1935	501-2,000	$100 million to $750 million	2	3
Xeriom Technology Services	Gilbert, Arizona	2004	26-100	Under $100 million	2	1
Z Systems Corporation	Upper Marlboro, Maryland	1993	26-100	Under $100 million	2	1

Como se puede apreciar de la tablita superior, una agencia gubernamental denominada "UNKNOWN" (DESCONOCIDA) cuenta con el segundo mayor número de companías contratistas a su servicio (455) solamente por debajo de la AGENCIA NACIONAL DE SEGURIDAD ESTADOUNIDENSE (NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY) para la cual trabajan 484 compañías contratistas.

Como se aprecia, la sociedad estadounidense puede ponerse a cantar porque su dinerillo está siendo invertido en infraestructura muy útil y cuando menos se lo piensen el campo de concentración estará reforzado a la enésima potencia dentro y fuera de su territorio. Claro que si quieren protestar un poquitín, han de tener en cuenta que ya se está estudiando qué es eso que puede hacer protestar a los pobladores de otras partes del mundo (y no es que Christina Aguilera o Cher canten terrible...). Con el tiempo podrán experimentar los resultados de tales estudios en carne propia (¡ji-ji-ji!):

[las letras en naranja son de perucine.blogspot.com]

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=62790

"News

American Forces Press Service

Panetta: Intelligence Community Needs to Predict Uprisings

By Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Feb. 11, 2011 – Because The intelligence community has to do a better job collecting information that will predict uprisings like those going on in Egypt, while also treating cybersecurity as the next battlefield, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta told a congressional committee yesterday.

The CIA filed nearly 400 reports last year describing the potential for disruption in the Middle East, but needs better collection “when it comes to triggers that ignite these conditions and cause the events that we’ve seen take place,” Panetta told the House Intelligence Committee.

Regressive political regimes, economic instability or stagnation, and lack of freedoms are common problems in the Middle East, and civil uprising becomes more likely as citizens experience unmet expectations, young people can’t get jobs, and the Internet allows for demonstrations to be organized quickly, Panetta said. “That's something we need to pay a lot more attention to in today's world,” he added.

Panetta said he has established a 35-member task force to focus specifically on the types of trigger points that led to unrest in Egypt and could happen in similar situations to be ready for problems when they occur.

“People can tell you where the tremors are, they can tell you where the fault lines are, they can tell you what the past is, they can even tell you that the threat of something happening is close,” he said. “But they can't tell you exactly when an earthquake is going to take place. Those are the kinds of things that are obviously very tough for intelligence to predict. But I think our job is to collect as much as we can to know those triggers."

Also, the CIA director called threats to the nation’s computer systems “a real national security threat that we have to pay attention to.”

“I've often said that I think the potential for the next Pearl Harbor could very well be a cyber attack,” he said. “If you have a cyber attack that brings down our power grid system, brings down our financial system, brings down our government systems, you could paralyze this country. And I think that's a real potential.”

U.S. agencies still need to develop not only defenses to such an attack, but also a warning system for trouble, Panetta said, noting that countries such as Russia, China and Iran are developing capacity in those areas.

“We're now the subject of literally hundreds of thousands of attacks that come in [on U.S. computer systems] in an effort to try to get information,” he said."

Biographies: Leon E. Panetta "

Es un texto muy gracioso y nos recuerdan las discusiones típicas respecto de "reconocer la situación revolucionaria" aunque, claro está, en el texto se discute una acción hasta cierto punto espontánea, solamente con manifestaciones organizada a través de internet.

Como nos enternece un discurso tan lleno de buena voluntad le recomendamos un texto... aunque solamente lo hacemos porque tiene deseos de aprender la teoría:

http://www.ceip.org.ar/escritos/Libro2/html/T02V235.htm

Y para que no tenga que leer tanto, le proporcionamos un pensamiento sobre el cual meditar:

"Si no eres parte de la solución... ¡entonces eres parte del problema!".

[La interpretación es abierta (¡¡¡¡ji-ji-ji-ji-ji-ji!!!!)].

6) Exalta la gran obra de DON LEÓNIDAS ZEGARRA UCEDA.

Los guiños que "NOCHES DE ENCANTO" (BURLESQUE) hace a los conocedores en relación a la gran obra del gran cineasta peruano DON LEÓNIDAS ZEGARRA UCEDA, nos obliga a concederle un espacio entre LOS MEJORES ESTRENOS 2011 EN EL PERÚ (BEST MOVIES 2011 IN PERU)

Como es usual con esta clase propaganda, uno de los personajes tiene un ojo cubierto como parte de la programación de la conducta del público. Curiosamente, "I" significa "yo" en inglés y suena igual que "eye" (ojo), lo que permite establecer en las emociones y mente del público angloparlante a influenciar una relación entre la mercancía exhibida y su ser propio. Debido a ello, gran cantidad de logos estadounidenses reproducen una forma simplificada del ojo humano semejante a la que se muestra en el billete de un dólar.

jorgevillacortasantamato.blogspot.com

leonidaszegarra.iespana.es

leonidaszegarra.blogspot.com
leonidaszegarravídeoentrevista
http://es-es.connect.facebook.com/people/Leonidas-Zegarra/1185423882