miércoles, 25 de octubre de 2017

LEONIDAS ZEGARRA AT THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF PERU!

TWO WONDERFUL MASTERPIECES HAVE BEEN ALREADY PROJECTED: "DE NUEVO A LA VIDA" (1973) AND "MI CRIMEN AL DESNUDO" (2001)!

 



"DE NUEVO A LA VIDA" (1973) (October 17, 2017):

















"MI CRIMEN AL DESNUDO" (2001). (October 24, 2017):



















---

viernes, 6 de octubre de 2017

LEONIDAS ZEGARRA. THE FILMMAKER. FILM FORUM. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF PERU. OCTOBER - NOVEMBER, 2017.

A RETROSPECTIVE DEVOTED TO THE GREATEST FILMMAKER EVER! THE COMMUNISTS COULDN'T DESTROY HIS CAREER AND HIS LEGACY!

The National Library of Peru is celebrating its 196 years! It film forum has organized a retrospective devoted to Leonidas Zegarra, The Anticommunist Filmmaker. Mr. Zegarra is one of the most talented filmmakers ever! According to the IMDb STARmeter, as a Peruvian filmmaker he many times ranks only behind Luis Llosa, who has developed a film career in the U.S.

The movies that will be projected can be seen at IMDb for free, too. So, the Americans interested in watching the feature films and shorts can do it, too. There is one movie that has not been posted at IMDb, though: "Chesu mare: Bullying diabólico" (2014).

Acording to knowledgable sources, new events are being organized to honor the filmmaker Leonidas Zegarra. Let's wait and see! This artist who promotes an American intervention in Venezuela in order to wipe out the Communist regime, deserves our respect!
---

lunes, 18 de septiembre de 2017

CIA, COMMUNISTS, PERUVIAN CINEMA.

WHILE THE COMMUNISTS STEAL PRIVATE PROPERTY AND CONTROL THE MEDIA, THEY ALWAYS ACCUSE THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OF "DESTABILIZING THE COUNTRY" INSTEAD OF RECOGNIZING THAT THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE CREATING HELL ON EARTH.

Sadly, one of the abundant cases that show how the Communists destroy societies is the Peruvian one.

During the 60's of the twentieth century, the Communists, disguised under the name "Peasant Unions" deprived hundred of land owners of their lands. At the end of the sixties, the coward Peruvian Armed Forces decided that "Communism" was the way to go and legalized the actions of thieves. Magazines like "Oiga", would supported the twisted Communist ideals.



While "Oiga", issue 354, December 1969, shows a cover with the title "What the CIA looks for in Chile", in page 33, we can find a letter signed by Desiderio Blanco and Isaac León Frías that states that the movie "En la selva no hay estrellas" directed by Armando Robles, that was recogized at the Second Peruvian Film Festival, should not have been due to its "exacerbated individidualism" ('exacerbado individualimo') that, supposedly, did not assumed the mission expected from a filmmaker in an underdeveloped country. Naturally, the signers do not mention that that "mission expected from a filmmaker" was the support of the communist ideals promoted by the Peruvian Armed Forces. They use other words and descriptions to disguise their intention. Obviously, only a pro-Communist magazine would welcome a letter like that. In pages 8, 9, 10,11, 38, we can find an article with the title "THE CIA AGAINST CHILE, PERÚ, AND BOLIVIA. THE GOAL: TO TRUNCATE THE PERUVIAN MODEL." This article demands (in page 38) that a strike should be investigated because it lasts too long and it points out to the entrepreneurs as the suspects of incentivating the strike. The writer (who signs with the initials "F.M."), pretends that the CIA is sabotaging the Peruvian economy in many ways at the international level. 


Why doesn't the writer notice that the Communists themselves are the ones who are destroying the country? Well, the answer is that the Communists are very good at repeating that the Central Intelligence Agency is the one who creates all the problems in the countries they themselves control instead of their own narrow-minded ideology.  

So, this story shows that the Communists cannot allow the individual artistic expression, because it is a terrible example that can be imitated by others. Additionally, after reading "Oiga" # 354, it seems that if you expresss yourself making a movie according to your own taste and not the one defined by the Communist censors, them you are an enemy and you work for the Central Intelligence Agency in order to destroy the Communist controlled country.

With Communist rulers, the arts cannot be developed, much less filmmaking. because it can inspire other people to think in ways different than the Communist ones!

 
  ---
The letter published by "Oiga" was the following one (in Spanish): 

"ACLARACIÓN
a los premios del 2do. festival de cine peruano
LA publicación periodística de los premios otorgados por el Jurado del Segundo Festival de Cine Peruano ha incurrido en una importante omisión. Salvo Correo – en su edición del viernes 5 y en el suplemento dominical Suceso del día 7 del presente -, los diarios de la capital han silenciado la fundamentacióin de una posición disconforme en el seno del Jurado.
Hacemos ahora esta aclaración por dos motivos: 1) Porque la totalidad de los miembros del Jurado estuvo de acuerdo en hacer pública la disconformidad de dos de dos de los mismos con el premio otorgado a En la selva no hay estrellas, y 2) porque siendo nosotros los miembros disconformes, queremos que nuestras razones sean conocidas del público interesado.
Podría parecer demasiado radical la opinión de “que la película En la selva no hay estrellas carece de valores cinematográficos y señala rumbos equivocados para el cine nacional”, opinión que sintetiza nuestra disconformidad con el fallo oficial por mayoría. Pero es el caso que en el periodismo nacional ha existido casi unanimidad – a excepción de Hablemos de cine, única revista especializada que se publica en el Perú – en considerar artísticamente valioso el filme de Armando Robles Godoy. Y con el premio otorgado en el Segundo Festival de ine Peruano estos pretendidos valores han conseguido una consagración oficial.
Los firmantes reconocemos la calidad artesanal de la película y el esfuerzo que ésta ha supuesto en su realización, aunque toda su perfección se reduzca a una mimética aplicación de normas de manual. Al mismo tiempo, consideramos que la pelicula ofrece una visión falsa de una realidad que, pretendiendo ser peruana y universal, a la vez, no es ni universal ni peruana. Y una película falsa no puede merecer nunca una distinción oficial.
En el caso de En la selva no hay estrellas, el premio otorgado es más equívoco aún, dado que la película se ubica en el marco de una cinematografia casi inexistente. En el conjunto de una cinematografía más desarrollada, la película de Robles Godoy no tendría la menor importancia. Pero en nuestro pais, el filme es rechazable porque amenaza abrir el camino a un cine ampuloso y complaciente, encerrado en un exacerbado individualismo en el que el realizador cinematográfico no asume la misión que le corresponde en un país subdesarrollado.
Lima, 10 de noviembre de 1969.
Desiderio Blanco
Isaac León Frias"

 ----

lunes, 11 de septiembre de 2017

ALBERTO ÍSOLA: ¡ACTOR CINEMATOGRÁFICO EXTRAORDINARIO!

¡ALBERTO ISOLA ES UN ACTOR DE PELÍCULA!


Uno de los actores peruanos más destacados en el campo del cine es, con certeza absoluta, ALBERTO ÍSOLA, cuya presencia en la pantalla grande marca un antes y un después en la historia del cine hecho en el Perú.

Tal vez la más memorable aparición de ALBERTO ÍSOLA en un largometraje, ocurrio en la película "CORAJE" (1999), dirigida por ALBERTO "CHICHO" DURANT. Su desempeño en el rol de ministro es excepcionalmente bueno, realmente extraordinario, un paradigma de la actuacion cinematográfica digno de se estudiado en un tratado que analice el caso.

Otro largometraje que demuestra lo idóneo que es para trabajar en el cine es el que desempeñó en "UNA SOMBRA AL FRENTE", dirigida por AUGUSTO TAMAYO. Su actuaciòn en aquél filme amerita otro tratado dedicado al estudio del caso. Como personaje dueño de un periódico, ALBERTO ÍSOLA llega a alturas jamàs alcanzadas en la actuación cinematográfica peruana y mundial.

El gran actor de teatro y cine, también lo es de la televisión. Sus destacados roles en gran número de telenovelas han contribuido a gestar el imaginario nacional con una calidad que puede ser clasificada muy justificadamente como genial. Aunque no estamos enterados de si ha dirigido algún largometraje, en Perucine.blogspot.com estamos absolutamente convencidos de que tal película será (o ya es) un hito histórico.

El equipo de redacción de Perucine.blogspot.com envía a ALBERTO ÍSOLA sus más admirados saludos. Su participación en la cinematografía peruana como actor, la coloca en situación privilegiada.
---

miércoles, 16 de agosto de 2017

ATOMIC BLONDE

STYLISH AND SEXY BRUTALITY PLUS CORPSES AND THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) WINS! THIS IS WHY THE AMERICAN FILMMAKING IS THE MOST ENTERTAINING OF THE WORLD!

ATOMIC BLONDE (2017) is the kind of movie that teaches real values to the young: 
A) The Communists and Communism are threats,
B) The Communists deserve to be killed,
C) The Communist system is crumbling permanently,
D) The U.S. always wins,
E) The CIA is the smartest and most effective intelligence agency of the world,
F) The U.S. must have trained people capable of going to the enemy territory and extract "packages."
G) Shooting and fighting properly is an asset,
I) To depend on personal resources is important,
J) A personal network is valuable.
K) The British are not as smart as they think.

To find a movie that offers practical knowledge of the current international relations is refreshing! Among so many pacifist manifestos and discourses of understanding toward the leftists, ATOMIC BLOND is a lesson of equanimity. Right now, when Communist Venezuela is going to be liberated, ATOMIC BLONDE activates the right mindset to face what is coming.


It is obvious that a totalitarian system like the one developed in Venezuela by the Communists have been supported by powerful international players that have strong ties to different capitalist countries and that must have infiltrated the U.S. Government. Luckily, the new U.S. President, Donald Trump, has wisdom enough as to recognize the peril that is growing in the American backyard. ATOMIC BLOND points out to these traitors that behind the curtains of power intend to enslave countries for-profit. This is not the American style!

After recovering the oil fields from Venezuela to the cause of Freedom, we will see important changes in the region. Venezuela is only the first one of many colossal interventions in Latin America! The time to fight Russia (or the Soviet Union) in lands so far away is over! ATOMIC BLONDE states a new beginning in the international arena. The military might of the U.S. will be imposed on all the nefarious Latin American countries that have been infiltrated by the Communist and are being ruled by them (which means ALL of them: Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, Chile, Perú, México, Guatemala, Honduras, Brasil, Colombia, etc.)

The American new generations need more movies like ATOMIC BLOND! Movies that teach practical values to survive in a world where the Communists exists...

viernes, 12 de mayo de 2017

DOES A COURSE LIKE "LITERATURE WITHOUT BORDERS: NARRATIVES FROM THE "COUNTRIES OF CONCERN"" SABOTAGE "WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN"?

OF COURSE! SYMPATHIZING WITH THE ENEMY UNDERMINES THE STRATEGY THAT HAS MADE AMERICA GREAT! OR WERE THE "NATIVE AMERICANS" MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE FOUNDING FATHERS?

It is evident that DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States, is surrounded by foes inside America. These enemies, disguised a "humanitarians" preach "tolerance" and "understanding of the 'other'" spreading evident DEFEATISIM among those attending university. 

While Mr. TRUMP intends to "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN", this "scholars" seem to ignore the facts that helped America become what it is. Definitely, TO COMPROMISE never has helped the U.S. The Vietnam War, a winnable war, was lost because the political battle was lost at home!


If Mr. TRUMP wants to "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN", and we believe that he wants, he must pay careful attention to the political war that is in development inside the U.S. right now. His enemies have entrenched themselves in those positions that allows them to exert ideological influence, the academia among them.

One clear example of this seems to be the course Literature without Borders: Narratives from the "Countries of Concern" taught online by professor Jeffrey Middents at American University, College of Arts & Sciences (Summer 2017):

http://www.american.edu/cas/faculty/middents.cfm

https://www.academia.edu/32972556/Literature_without_Borders_Narratives_from_the_Countries_of_Concern_

The syllabus begins by quoting from "PEN America's open letter to Mr. Trump, February 21, 2017" which is a political text that condemns one of the measures taken by Mr. TRUMP to secure the American territory:

https://pen.org/open-letter-immigration-ban/

After that, the course is introduced:

" (...). In listing seven nations, called “countries of concern” by the Department of State, whose citizens were banned from entering the United States, the government offered a blanket assessment of the potential ideologies determined by nation of origin. (...).  Such proclamations make blanket statements about “foreign nationals” and their habits, their thoughts and their lives. How can we dig beyond such overarching assumptions proffered by the news and government officials to explore other cultures, the perspectives of the “other”?"

So, what is stated is that the government officials (especially Mr. TRUMP) and the news have made "overarching assumptions"... and that the objective of the course is to become acquainted with the viewpoints of the "countries of concern." So, this course is propaganda for those "countries of concerns" that do not need to invest in ideological warfare due to the fact that the American students can be indoctrinated in American terrritory through an American university which name is "American University." Isn't "American University" an ideal name to make look trustworthy the indoctrination programs created to support the "countries of concern"? The timing of this course is fantastic! And the name of the course "Literature without Borders" suggests that America doesn't have frontiers to watch!

The syllabus continues:

"This course will resist monolithic claims about “hostile nations” and explore how to search for and interpret contemporary literature (and, where available, films) from those countries, despite the fact that we do not speak the original languages spoken in these countries."

The way the subject is faced is extremely interesting because what it is stating is that the course doesn`t accept the authority of the President and other government officials. If the couse wanted, it could study the characteristics of the contemporary literature of those "hostile nations" which would be useful in the battle of ideas. But this is not the stated goal of the course. The text clearly says that "this course will resist monolithic claims about "hostile nations"." So, the real objective is to undermine the authority of the President and government officials because "explore how to search for and interpret contemporary literature (and where available, films) from those countries"  are actions that must be develop even when we want to learn from those "hostile nations" in order to fight them better. Learning how the enemy thinks is important. Knowing how to look for that information is a basic skill of an information warrior. Thus, the skill is not  a privilege enjoyed by those who "resist monolithic claims about "hostile nations"" at all. But the text pretends that the only reason to look for information about the enemy literature and cinema is when we distrust the news and government official, especially Mr. TRUMP, and when we look to empathize with the enemy viewpoint. These two underlying assumptions make this one a subversive course. "TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN" would be a bit difficult when this mind poison is poured into the consciousnesses of the American students. 

Another indicator of the tendency of the syllabus is a quote selected from a text written by the scholar Tamara Falicov:

·(...) Tamara Falicov argues that movies produced in Argentina under the aegis of Roger Corman's production companies during the 1980s negatively impacted the Argentine film industry. (...). She concludes that such coproductions support how the economic model of "dependency theory" might be applied to "how First World elits exploit poorer nations in their exhaustive search for ever cheaper sources of labor, raw materials and lax governmental regulations abroad" (36). Falicov's goal is to bring attention to the unequal relationship between otherwise ignored exploitation filmmaking designed for the U.S. home video market and the more art-oriented "national cinema" of Argentina. The article provides a good model for how to approach exploitation.

With so many books about filmmaking, the syllabus selects a text that links the American capital abroad with exploitation. While Mr. TRUMP intends to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! and strenghen the capitalist production at home, the future workforce is fertilized with thoughts of exploitation... Obviously, to choose such a text has the same subversive inspiration than the whole course.

America is at war and Mr. TRUMP must take the initiative to win. Mr. TRUMP has lots of enemies in the academic world:

http://www.providencejournal.com/news/20160627/trump-claims-state-department-gave-552-million-to-company-after-it-hired-bill-clinton

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-laureate-faces-challenges-20161008-story.html

History shows WHAT HAS MADE AMERICA GREAT: it is not defeatism, it is not compromising, it is not a lot of "humanists" empathizing with the the American foes.

George Washington and the Indians:

Thomas Jefferson, Founding Father of Indian Removal. By Mark Hirsch
http://westgatehouse.com/art263.html

Communism's Present-Day Stranglehold on America, Universities
https://theamericanrevenant.com/2016/11/27/communisms-present-day-stranglehold-on-america-universities/

The Techniques of Communism: INVADING EDUCATION. By Louis F. Budenz
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/educatio.htm

Communist Defector Speaks Out on America's Marxist Future
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/communist-defector-speaks-out-on-americas-marxist-future/
---

sábado, 6 de mayo de 2017

"NEW TAIWANESE CINEMA IN FOCUS: MOVING WITHIN AND BEYOND THE FRAME" BY FLANNERY WILSON. BOOK REVIEW.


FASCINATING READING! GREAT ADVICE TO BE SUCCESSFUL AT THE BOX OFFICE... IF YOUR PRODUCTION IS SUPPORTED BY THE AMERICAN FILM INDUSTRY! KINDHEARTED WRITING FOR HUMANE LEARNING ABOUT TAIWANESE CINEMA!

"NEW TAIWANESE CINEMA IN FOCUS: MOVING WITHIN ND BEYOND THE FRAME." Cover. Author: FLANNERY WILSON. Published by EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY PRESS.  200 Pages.
Book Review by Perucine.blogspot.com Board of Film:

-
-
---