¡EL COMPLEJO MILITAR - INDUSTRIAL - CONGRESAL - HOLLYWOOD EN ACCIÓN!
THE MILITARY - INDUSTRIAL - CONGRESSIONAL - HOLLYWOOD COMPLEX AT WORK!
The 14 Most Ridiculous Lawsuits Filed by the RIAA and the MPAA
Why Hollywood Hates RealDVD
Why MPAA Should Lose Against RealDVD
Digital Rights Management: A failure in the developed world, a danger to the developing world
MPAA Shows How Teachers Should Record Movies By Camcording Their TVs
from the ok-then... dept
VIDEO: MPAA’s Chris Dodd Stumps For Piracy Act
RealNetworks accuses MPAA of antitrust violations
In court filing, Real claims the six largest film studios violated Sherman Antitrust Act by conspiring against the software maker.
Judge seals courtroom in MPAA DVD-copying case
DVD Copy Control Association says public should be barred from the courtroom because information about the technology used to encrypt DVDs is a trade secret.
by Greg Sandoval and Declan McCullagh
RealNetworks, Inc. v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc.
http://leonidaszegarra.blogspot.com/2012/02/la-virgen-de-copacabana-en-ejutv.html
5 comentarios:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/19/exclusive-hollywood-lobbyist-threatens-to-cut-off-obama-2012-money-over-anti/
EXCLUSIVE: Chris Dodd warns of Hollywood backlash against Obama over anti-piracy bill
Published January 19, 2012
FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/19/exclusive-hollywood-lobbyist-threatens-to-cut-off-obama-2012-money-over-anti/#ixzz2DdHKE9Sa
http://www.independentsentinel.com/2012/01/petition-wants-chris-dodd-investigated-for-bribery/
Petition Asks White House to Investigate Chris Dodd for Bribery
January 22, 2012
By Sara Noble
http://www.fayerwayer.com/2012/01/solicitan-investigacion-a-la-mpaa-por-posible-soborno-a-politicos/
MPAA podría ser investigada por sobornar a políticos
19
Cony Sturm
http://www.cfr.org/experts/world/christopher-j-dodd/b5486
Christopher Dodd (D-CT) is a second-generation Connecticut senator (his father Thomas held the office throughout the 1960s). He started his career in public service in the Peace Corps in the Dominican Republic during the late 1960s, gaining fluency in Spanish. Also a result of lessons learned in the Peace Corps, Dodd has emphasized the importance of national service, making an “American Community Initiative” a key part of his platform.
Dodd is the only Democratic candidate to have spent time in the military, with stints in the Army Reserves and National Guard. He served in the House of Representatives for five years before his 1980 election to the Senate. He has been a rare voice in Congress focusing on Latin American politics, at times taking positions unpopular in Washington, such as his advocacy for an end to the U.S. embargo on Cuba. He chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, Peace Corps, and Narcotics.
Dodd has made pointed foreign policy critiques of his fellow candidates and the Bush administration throughout the campaign. Though he voted for the invasion of Iraq in 2002, Dodd has attacked front-running Democratic candidates for refusing to pledge to remove U.S. troops from Iraq by 2013.
Dodd withdrew his candidacy in January 2008. In February 2008, Dodd endorsed Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) for the Democratic nomination.
http://www.intlawgrrls.com/2007/11/human-rights-v-national-security.html
Then it was the turn of Sen. Christopher Dodd (Massachusetts) (left):
BLITZER: What is more important, human rights or national security?
DODD: Obviously, national security, keeping the country safe. When you take the oath of office on January 20, you promise to do two things, and that is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and protect our country against enemies both foreign and domestic. The security of the country is number one, obviously.
Finally, the moderator turned from Dodd to Sen. Hillary Clinton (New York) (left):
BLITZER: You say national security is more important than human rights. Senator Clinton, what do you say?
CLINTON: I agree with that completely. The first obligation of the president of the United States is to protect and defend the United States of America. That doesn't mean that it is to the exclusion of other interests.
And there's absolutely a connection between a democratic regime and heightened security for the United States. That's what's so tragic about this situation. After 9/11, President Bush had a chance to chart a different course, both in Pakistan and in Afghanistan, and could have been very clear about what our expectations were.
Publicar un comentario