sábado, 4 de mayo de 2019

ACADEMY FILMS SCHOLARS PROGRAM 2019. PROJECT "HOLLYWOOD MOVIES AS BYPRODUCT OF A VIRTUAL WORLD" BY JORGE LUIS VILLACORTA SANTAMATO.

from:sguthrie@oscars.org
to:JORGEVILLACORTA1@gmail.com
cc:grants@oscars.org
date:May 3, 2019, 2:32 PM
subject:Academy Grants Program
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
:Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.

Dear Jorge:

Recently, the Academy’s Grants Committee met to select the recipients of the 2019 Academy Film Scholars Grants.  Out of 58 applications received, the Committee members were pleased and excited to discover a number of exceptional proposals.  After a great deal of discussion including praise for a number of the proposals, the committee ultimately selected two.  Regrettably, your proposal was not selected.

A press release announcing the two newest Academy Film Scholars will be distributed in the near future and I will make sure a copy is e-mailed to you.

The committee asked me to inform the applicants how much they enjoyed reading the proposals and how worthy many of them seemed.  They anticipate that a number of the proposals will come to fruition.  If you wish to re-apply, the online application form will be available once again in late summer or early fall.

Best of luck in all your future endeavors.

Sincerely,
Shawn Guthrie
Sr. Manager, Grants and Student Academy Awards

-----
Project Statement
By Jorge Villacorta
Hollywood Movies As Byproduct Of A Virtual World.
a. Description of the Project.
This is a beautiful and entertaining book that explains how all the Hollywood movies can be the byproduct of a virtual world.

b. Definitions:
Objective: To describe how the Hollywood movies can be the byproduct of a virtual world.
Methodology: Observation of the Hollywood movies. Description of how they are related to the hypothesis of a virtual world.

c. Academic and Professional Context.
While there are many scholars that explain the new technologies (virtual worlds, nanotechnology, fractal narrative, synthetic telepathy, brain-computer interface, etc.), their futures, and the potential consequences of their applications, these scholars don’t assume that we are living in a virtual world already. Books like Neuroengineering the future: virtual minds and the creation of immortality by Bruce Katz, or The Sentient Machine. The Coming Age of Artificial Intelligence by Amir Husain, are waiting for a future that, from the perspective of my project is already here. This fact makes my project unique.

d. Portions of my project that examines film industry subjects or ideas that have been underrepresented in the canon of film scholarship to date.
Even though the film industry deals with the idea of virtual worlds very often, the scholars do not assume that they are living in a virtual world already, probably because they don't want to be labeled as schizophrenic. It is evident that many people have intuitions of living in a virtual world as can be seen in many literary works and in many films. A new perspective of study may provide new amazing results and conclusions.  The scientific inquiry shouldn't feel intimidated by prejudices or social pressure.

e. Significance of the project in its field of study.
My project will allow the readers to see a phenomenon that they cannot watch by themselves due to cultural conditioning: that the daily dramas they may be experiencing are the consequences of living in a virtual theme park, a synthetic world designed to provide entertainment, emotions, and satisfactions, depending on the desires of the clients.

f. How my profesional experience is relevant to the project.
As a scholar, researcher, actor, assistant director, editor, media adviser, and curator, I notice an artificial quality in daily life that I cannot explain with the current reasoning in the academic, religious, or technological worlds. My field observations lead me to conclude that certain questions have been asked from a wrong perspective.

g. Timetable for completing the project.
Date
Activity

May 1, 2019.

I begin to gather information in order to write Hollywood Movies As Byproduct Of A Virtual World.
June 1, 2019.
I begin to write the book.
August 1, 2019.
I finish the first draft of the book.
August 2 – December 24, 2019.
I revise the book and prepare it for printing.
December 25, 2019
The book is printed.

h. Grants, residencies, and additional resources available to me. How I intend to use the Academy grant.
There aren’t additional resources but mine. I intend to use the Academy grant wisely.
-----

Select Bibliography
By Jorge Villacorta
Hollywood Movies As Byproduct Of A Virtual World

Bainbridge, William Sim (2011). The Virtual Future. New York: Springer.
Bandyopadhyay, Anirban (july 15, 2019). Nanobrain: Making and Intelligent Molecular Machine. Place of printing not identified: CRC Press.
Berg, Philip S. and Kabbalah Centre International (2012). Nano. Technology of Mind Over Matter. New York, N.Y.: Kabbalah Centre International.
Dodsworth, Clark Jr. (editor) (1998). Digital Illusion: Entertaining the Future with High Technology. New York, NY: ACM Pres/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Duarte, German A. (2014). Fractal Narrative: About the Relationship Between Geometries and Technology and its Impact on Narrative Spaces. Bielefeld:Transcript-Verlag.
Evans, Andrew (2001). The Virtual Life: Escapism and Simulation in Our Medial World. London: Fusion Press.
Franckh, Pierre (2014). The DNA Field and the Law of Resonance: Creating Reality Through Conscious Thought. Rochester, Vt: Destiny Books.
Gauthier, Jean-Marc (2005). Building Interactive Worlds in 3D. Virtual Sets and Previsualization for Games, Film & the Web. China: Focal Press.
Husain, Amir (2018). The Sentient Machine. The Coming Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Scribner, an imprint of Simon & Shuster.
Imre, Sándor and Balázs Ferenc (2013). Computing and Communications. An Engineering Approach. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Katz, Bruce F. (2008). Neuroengineering the future: virtual minds and the creation of immortality. Hingham, Mass: Infinity Science Press.
Milburn, Colin (2015). Fun and Games in the World of Digital Matter. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nayar, Pramod K. (2004). Virtual Worlds. Culture and Politics in the Age of Cybertechnology. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt  Ltd.
Pulizzi, James John (2012). Fractal realism: the folding together of literatura, technical media, and cognition in the twentieth century. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California. Los Angeles.
Rössler, Otto E. (1988). Endophysics. The World As An Interface. Singapore: Eurasia Press Pie Ltd.
Steinicke, Frank (2016). Being Really Virtual. Inmersive Natives and the Future of Virtual Reality. : Springer. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Thomas, Paul (2013). Nano Art. The Immateriality of Art. Chicago, IL: Intelect and The University of Chicago Press.
Tiffin, John and Nobuyoshi, Terashima (editors) (2001). Hyperreality. Paradigm for the Third Millennium. London and New York: Routledge.
Tricart, Celine (2018). Virtual Reality Filmmaking: Techniques and Best Practices.for VR Filmmakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
William, Walter Jon (1992). Aristoi. New York; TOR.
Walpaw, Jonathan, and Walpaw, Elizabeth Winter (editors) (2012). Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principle and Practice. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
-----

viernes, 3 de mayo de 2019

ACADEMY FILM SCHOLARS PROGRAM 2019. PROJECT "DONALD TRUMP: ACTOR'S ACTOR. A MARXIST PERSPECTIVE" BY JORGE LUIS VILLACORTA SANTAMATO.

from:sguthrie@oscars.org
to:JORGEVILLACORTA1@gmail.com
cc:grants@oscars.org
date:May 3, 2019, 2:15 PM
subject:Academy Grants Program
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
:Important according to Google magic.

Dear Jorge:

Recently, the Academy’s Grants Committee met to select the recipients of the 2019 Academy Film Scholars Grants.  Out of 58 applications received, the Committee members were pleased and excited to discover a number of exceptional proposals.  After a great deal of discussion including praise for a number of the proposals, the committee ultimately selected two.  Regrettably, your proposal was not selected.

A press release announcing the two newest Academy Film Scholars will be distributed in the near future and I will make sure a copy is e-mailed to you.

The committee asked me to inform the applicants how much they enjoyed reading the proposals and how worthy many of them seemed.  They anticipate that a number of the proposals will come to fruition.  If you wish to re-apply, the online application form will be available once again in late summer or early fall.

Best of luck in all your future endeavors.

Sincerely,
Shawn Guthrie
Sr. Manager, Grants and Student Academy Awards

-----


Project Statement
By Jorge Villacorta
Donald Trump: Actor's Actor. A Marxist Perspective.
a. Description of the Project.
This is a beautiful and entertaining book that explains why from a Marxist perspective, Donald Trump is an awesome actor.

b. Definitions:
Objective: To explain why from a Marxist perspective Donald Trump is an awesome actor.
Methodology: Observation from a Marxist perspective of those movies where Mr. Trump appears. Description of those appearances in the context of class struggle. Explanation of the social importance of those appearances as an actor from a Marxist perspective.

c. Portions of my project that examine film industry subjects or ideas that have been underrepresented in the canon of film scholarship to date.
Trumpism as well as Marxism and the concept of class struggle are underrepresented in the canon of film scholarship to date. The scholars prefer to take distance from the political position of Donald Trump and due to the fact that mainstream movies are investments, the investors don't want to ptomote the concept of class struggle. My project applies Marxism and class struggle to show what an amazing and tremendous, truly terrific, classy actor Donald Trump is.

c. Academic and Professional Context.
Donald Trump communicates brilliantly with the film audiences and it is important to analyze his style and techniques. The book Reagan: An Icon, by Ewan Morgan, recognized that Mr. Reagan, who used to be an actor, had also great communication skills, but that book isn’t written from a Marxist perspective. In fact, most books on actor or performers turned politicians (Clint Eastwood, Sonny Bono, John Gavin, George Murphy, Jesse Ventura, etc.) don’t deal with the subject from a Marxist perspective. This fact makes my project unique.

e. Significance of the project in its field of study.
Most media scholars aren’t linking the contribution of Mr. Trump’s film appearances to the building of his political image. Mr. Trump’s film image is, precisely, a subliminal construction of this political image. These scholars separate entertainment and politics, but a Marxist perspective considers both of them as diferente aspect of one phenomenon: the class struggle.

f. How my profesional experience is relevant to the project.
As a scholar, researcher, actor, assistant director, editor, media adviser, and curator, I see how different moments of exposure build on an public image. Living in a Third World country increases my political awareness due to the characteristics of the daily local life.

g. Timetable for completing the project.
Date
Activity

May 1, 2019.

I begin to gather information in order to write Donald Trump: Actor’s Actor. A Marxist Perspective.
June 1, 2019.
I begin to write the book.
August 1, 2019.
I finish the first draft of the book.
August 2 – December 24, 2019.
I revise the book and prepare it for printing.
December 25, 2019
The book is printed.

h. Grants, residencies, and additional resources available to me. How I intend to use the Academy grant.
There aren’t additional resources but mine. I intend to use the Academy grant wisely.
-----

Select Bibliography
By Jorge Villacorta
Donald Trump: Actor's Actor. A Marxist Perspective
Alford, Matthew (2010). Reel Power. Hollywod Cinema and America Supremacy. London: Pluto Press.
Blouin, Michael (2016). Magical thinking, fantastic film, and the illusions of neoliberalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bongino, Dan (2018). Spygate: The Attempted Sabotage of Donald J. Trump. Nasville, Tenn: Post Hill Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Susan Emanuel (2006). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Buskirk, Chris and Leibsohn, Seth (2017). How Conservatism, Inc. Missed the 2016 Election & what the D.C. Establishment Needs to Learn. Washington D.C.: WND Books.
García Espinoza, Julio (1983). “For an imperfect cinema” from Twenty-five years of the New Latin American cinema pp 28-33, London BFI.
Gutiérrez Alea, Tomás and Sánchez Oliva, Iralda (1988). The viewer’s dialectic. La Habana: Editorial José Martí.
Hadjinicolaou, Nicos (1978). Art History and Class Struggle.  London: Pluto Press.
Hadjinicolaou, Nicos (1981). La producción artística frente a sus significados. Mexico City: Siglo XXI Editores.
Haiven, Max (2018). Art after money, Money after Art. Creative Strategies Against Financialization. London: Pluto Press.
Hathherley, Owen (2016). The Chaplin Machine: Slapstick, Fordism and the Communist Avant-Garde. London: Pluto Press.
Hauser, Arnold (2016). The Social History of Art: Naturalism, Impressionism, the Film Age. New York, NY: Routledge.
James, David E. and Berg, Rick (1996). The hidden foundation: cinema and the question of class. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Jordan, Chris (2003). Movies and the Reagan Presidency: Success and Ethics. Wesport, Conn: Praeger.
Kornbluh, Anna (May 02, 2019). Marxist Film Theory and Fight Club. Unknown: Bloomsbury Academic.
Leigh, Mary K. and Durand, Kevin K. (2013). Marxism and the Movies. Critical Essays On Class Struggle In The Cinema. North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc.
Metzger, Robert P. (1989). Reagan. American icon. Lewisburg, Pa: Bucknell University.
O’Neill, Deirdre (2018).  Film as a radical pedagogic tool. New York: Routledge.
Sayer, Sean (1998). Marxism and human nature. London: Routledge.
Trump, Ivana and Fraser, Alison (2017). Raising Trump. New York, NY: Gallery Books.
Usual Gang Of Idiots (2017). Mad about Trump: a Brilliant Look at Our Brainless President. New York, NY: Mad Publications.
Walker, John A. (2002) Art and celebrity. London: Pluto Press.
Wayne, Mike (2005). Understanding film: Marxist perspectives. London: Pluto Press.
Woods, Allan (2001). Art and Class Struggle. St. Paul, Minn: Wellred.

------